We have spent a great deal of time exploring values oriented
approaches to messaging. We’ve read
Lakoff and discussed in great lengths the power of framing. But is it enough to focus on values? While values provide a powerful access point
to the underlying factors that drive behaviour, Shove would likely argue that
we are not reaching deep enough. We need
to get to the underlying emotions that inform the values that drive behaviour.
I don’t doubt the power of a values oriented approach, but
even in the transparent forms framing discussed in the Common Cause seem somewhat manipulative, and in the end I’m not
sure if the changes they create are sustainable. If the underlying emotions that impact values
are not addressed, is a return to our default state not inevitable?
It was interesting to consider the three pairs of frames
that were identified as possessing the greatest potential to impact the desired
values.
·
Self interest vs. Common interest
·
Strict father vs. Nurturant parent
·
Elite governance vs. Participative democracy
So to what degree should we allow “our brains to be messaged”? It would be interesting to see a political
campaign with some real money behind it call into question our values, rather
than trying to manipulate them for their own ends. In the end no single approach is enough. Values oriented approaches have worked for ad
agencies for decades, but every manipulative messaging technique eventually
runs its course. You could argue that
the environmental movement continues to lag a few paces behind marketing firms
that have been using frames for decades, or at least ever since consumers became desensitized to product informed
advertising. Will the same thing happen
to values oriented approaches, we probably don’t have to explicitly add transparency
to the messaging, after a while the audience will see right through it
anyway. I’m not actually that cynical
about framing, there exists no single messaging technique capable of addressing
the issues our biosphere currently faces, and values oriented approaches are a
known commodity. However, the search
continues for an ever stronger leverage point.
Thanks. Exactly the sort of reflections and critical engagement I feel is so productive. I hope you do, too!
ReplyDelete